RSS

Innovations in National Guard Officership in WWI

Camp Cody 34th ID

Innovations in National Guard Officership in WWI

At the onset of World War I, military officership was formed around ideas of education, class, and noblesse oblige.  Officers in both the National Guard and Regular Army were usually selected through personal or political connections and trained through apprenticeship.  Increasing the size of the officer corps by 20,000 men in two years in preparation for World War I forced the army to develop a system of standardized officer training and selection which more closely mirrors today’s ideals of meritocracy—a chance for army regulars, guardsmen and draftees to test their methods of selection and training on the battlefield.

The largest source of officer commissions in World War I by far was through the Officer Training Camps, or OTCs. Incredibly, 74% of Army officers in WWI* were commissioned with just 90 days of standardized training.  National Guard officers were the next largest group, making up 9% of officer ranks, while regular officers comprised just 5%. Even with the Dick Act of 1903, which pushed for professionalization in the guard, federalizing National Guard officers and graduates of “Plattsburg” military training camps had failed to produce the consistent quality or quantity of officers needed for rapid growth.  The OTCs, revolutionary in their scale, were established with only 14-15 weeks of preparation time to establish a system of screening applicants, building camp infrastructure, developing training regimes and assigning the newly commissioned officers to their divisions before the draftees arrived.  One of largest problems in growing the army so quickly at the outset of the declaration of war was assigning the current regular army and National Guard officers to greatest effect. These first cadres were made of a combination of regular army and National Guard officers.

While college graduates were preferred, the army relaxed its requirement for college attendance, placing more discretion in the OTCs in selecting candidates who had shown leadership in their civilian careers. In selection, the army turned to the nascent felt of psychology and intelligence testing, which has progressed considerably but never been abandoned by the army since.  These citizen soldiers in the initial classes, drawn from volunteers from colleges, businesses and local communities proved to be some of the most educated, intelligent and motivated officers the army had seen.

Mobilized regular army, National Guard and National Army units all faced an overwhelming influx of personnel transfers and unit re-designations leading up to their deployments.  Regular army and OTC officers were often transferred into National Guard units, and experienced soldiers and NCOs were transferred into new divisions and replaced by draftees.  Popular wisdom passed on to new officers in the OTC system was that the National Guard style of leadership was chummy and often faltered into fraternization.  Regular Army Officers complained that the National Guard units held close ties that undermined discipline when officers were reluctant to interfere with social and business relationships after the war.  However, the same relationships were said to motivate officers, since a poor performance as an officer would mire their personal and professional lives in the communities.  It’s unclear how much National Guard officers were actually different, but it’s important to note that the influx of new draftees and war-motivated volunteers were also different.  It was a ‘citizen army’ now and a culture which encouraged honest discussion between officer and enlisted, now a common ideal in units, was dubious to the West Point and OTC lieutenants and hard-boiled sergeants of the time.

Considering that the Army began the war with only 17,00 Regular Army, National Guard and Army Reserve Officers, the fact that the first two OTC sessions graduated 44,578 new officers was no small feat.  Moreover, it represented the first time in U.S. Army history where the majority of officers had standardized training. The National Guard officers of the era supplied knowledge and experience to the OTC program and in the battlefield, and helped to develop a more egalitarian form of leadership in the army.  Meanwhile, the army’s push for equal opportunity in selection and training paid dividends back into the National Guard as it set the precedent in officer selection and training we see in our modern National Guard.

               

Sources:

Faulkner, Richard.  School of Hard Knocks: Combat Leadership in the American Expeditionary Forces.  College Station, Texas A&M Press, 2012.

Doubler, Michael. I Am the Guard: A History of the Army National Guard 1636-2000. Washington, Government Printing Office, 2001.

*this excludes direct commissions for fields such as medical, dental and chaplain.  Overall, 48% of total officers commissioned through OTCs.

About the author:  Miranda Summers Lowe is a captain in the DC National Guard.  She is currently serving on the OEF Study Group at the Army Center of Military History.

NGEF Hosts Book Panel

  On July 26, 2017, NGEF hosted a panel review of Major MJ Hegar’s Shoot Like a Girl.  NGEF hosted approximately 25 guests from around the local area for a round-table discussion of Major Hegar’s fascinating autobiography, Shoot Like a Girl.  The title refers to the oft quoted rubric that women shoot better than men because [...]

AGAUS 2017

AGAUS visits the National Capital Foodbank during Conference Weekend.   This year, as in years past, the Adjutant General Association of the United States (AGAUS) held their conference at the NGAUS headquarters in Washington, DC.  The National Guard Memorial is also home to NGEF and we were delighted to escort the AGAUS Spouses around the [...]

The D.C. Riots of 1968

    The day James Earl Ray assassinated Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., rioting broke out in several historically black neighborhoods in D.C. People were devastated, frustrated, and filled with confusion and rage. All of these emotions erupted into chaos for three days in April 1968. President Johnson deployed over 13,000 Federal troops, including 1,750 [...]

Innovations in National Guard Officership in WWI

Innovations in National Guard Officership in WWI At the onset of World War I, military officership was formed around ideas of education, class, and noblesse oblige.  Officers in both the National Guard and Regular Army were usually selected through personal or political connections and trained through apprenticeship.  Increasing the size of the officer corps by [...]

NGAUS D-Day Battlefield Tour, 2016

This year, NGEF was proud to sponsor the first NGAUS D-Day Battlefield Tour! 15 participants were led by BG (ret) Theodore Shuey on an unforgettable adventure to learn about the sacrifice and victories of Allied forces in Normandy. Archivist Ryan Trainor attended the trip as a representative of NGEF. The tour explored the Dog Green [...]

Intern Program at the National Guard Memorial Museum, Library, and Archive

The Intern Program at the National Guard Memorial Museum is entering its 4th successful year with over a dozen interns having passed through our artifact room! What started as a small initiative to expand the staff through volunteerism quickly grew into a program designed to educate and support students of Museum Studies in the local [...]

NGEF Supports AGAUS Conference 2016

The National Guard Educational Foundation does more than manage a Museum, Library, and Archive!  Along with hosting an Army Ten-Miler Team, an annual Golf Tournament, and two scholarships for the benefit of National Guard soldiers and airmen, NGEF staff supports the Adjutant General Association of the United States (AGAUS) during their annual conferences.  This year, [...]

239th Anniversary of the Battle of Brooklyn, August 27th 1776

NGEF’s Archivist, Ryan Trainor had the pleasure of visiting Brooklyn, New York with members of the Maryland Society, Sons of the American Revolution last month in commemoration of the 239th anniversary of the Revolutionary War battle which occurred there. It is regarded by military historians as one of the most resounding battles of the Revolutionary [...]

NGAUS Conference Transcripts from 1879 to Present

    The National Guard Association of the United States (“NGAUS”) will be holding its 137th General Conference September 10-13, 2015 in Nashville, Tennessee (#NGAUS2015). The National Guard Educational Foundation (“NGEF”) Archives maintains a full transcript of every General Conference NGAUS holds! You can see the picture of the first and third Conference transcripts above [...]

NGEF Staff Visits the National Museum of the Marine Corps

On March 3, 2015, the NGEF Staff and Interns visited the National Museum of the Marine Corps in Quantico, VA. NGEF is fortunate to host Ms. Sara Halpert from the graduate school program in Museum Studies at George Washington University and Ms. Kristee Copley from the iSchool at the University of Maryland in Library Sciences. [...]